missing-private-class-documentation (PDF605)¶
PDF604 missing-public-class-documentation
Next rule →PDF606 missing-public-nested-class-documentation
Added in 1.0.0
Never fix
Requires explicit
Part of the PDF rule category.
View source · View documentation source · Search issues
Fix is not available.
Rule must by default be explicitly selected, unless it is removed from require-explicit.
What it does¶
Checks for private top-level classes that are missing docstrings.
A top-level class is private when its own name or containing module path is private.
Why is this useful?¶
Private classes can still benefit from local documentation when a project chooses to require it.
Ruff compatibility¶
None.
Examples¶
A private top-level class without a docstring is reported:
class _Client:
pass
PDF605: Line 1: Private class '_Client' is missing docstring
A public-looking class in a private module path is private:
class Client:
pass
PDF605: Line 1: Private class 'Client' is missing docstring
A documented private top-level class is accepted:
class _Client:
"""Internal client."""
Public top-level classes are handled by PDF604 instead:
class Client:
pass
Options¶
None.
PDF604 missing-public-class-documentation
Next rule →PDF606 missing-public-nested-class-documentation